How could the flood possibly cause this? http://home.entouch.net/dmd/beijingsoil.htm I can't figure out any possible rationalization for this data. That's 1...
As I've stated many times, that my Flood model includes all such anomalies, assuming they are fact. See my website.In particular, my third belief statement,...
Dr. Robert A. Herrmann
drrah@...
Jul 3, 2007 3:03 pm
8175
evolution, creation, or both? Explain. This is the Yahoo Question I have asked. So far we have 2 evolutionists, 1 theistic evolutionist, and a long age...
Beijing has two rivers flowing through it. These rivers have been tamed in recent history. But in times past it would have been flooded regularly. With feet of...
Very funny. The head line reads 1,000,000 years. The very next line looses 400,000 years. They assume that this dust is being blown in from somewhere? Maybe it...
... He is assuming that the deposits all come from the same source as the dust that he sees falling now. More likely the dust he now sees comes from those...
Mr. Morton doesn't tell us if he's over 1,000,000 years old to have observed this supposed constant rate of deposition. Anyone who has ever been around...
The key is that as is typical of uniformitarian thinking Morton is assuming a constant rate of disposition. In this case such an assumption is totally ...
It depends on how one interprets the fossil record. This not a cop out, but an honest objective answer. Young Earth Creationists, Old Earth Creationists and...
These two guys agree, at a cursory glance, that the stuff is loess. Isaac Asimov once said, IIRC, that he expected the Earth to have lots more meteor dust...
I recall reading a sci-fi short story about a transportation disaster on the moon. The author speculated that the dust layer would be so deep that the right...
Most likely, it would never occur to Evolutionists to C14 date dino soft tissue. After all they "know" that it is more than 65 million years old and no C14...
While that is possible it would not be acceptable to evolutionists or even most other old Earthers. The best that should have been around was Homo erectus and...
Is that visible structure an ancient building, or is it simply a newer, existing foundational structure? I doubt that they would have poured that ~20' base...
I believe the loess is best explained as post flood wind deposits during the first years after the flood when trees and ground cover were not yet holding soil...
Howie Motz wrote: Have any of you heard if this has been done? Are the results being kept secret? Or are they afraid to do the test? ~~~~~ Paul Humber's...
I don't understand why anyone would stretch out the genealogies to reach a 10,000 year old earth? To me there are no justifications, and you still the subject...
Jeremy Dasen ... Except that based one the picture, the 20' base layer seems to be dirt (the same dust they are digging in) not a poured wall. ... If it is a...
Dan, Part of the thinking comes from an assumption that one has to make before one even starts talking about chronology (the genealogies). The assumption that...
Another possibility that has been tossed out is that the loess deposits are even post ice age (the one caused by & after the Flood). After ice age meltdown...
Most creationist now accept the 6000 year date Aig has so strongly defended. But the reason I have never been 100% happy with this date and would prefer a 7000...
Reminds me of the story of "Glacier Girl". "It's interesting that the observed evidence for rapid formation of ice layers is also ignored. This can be seen in...
I am going to fuse these latest two topics ("6000 to 10000 year old earth" and "1,000,000 years worth of Loess deposits) into one new topic that might be worth...
WDOUGWILDER@... ... defended. ... prefer a ... the ... dated ... The problem that this date is based on a chronology for Egypt that while accepted by...
How is creationism potentially falsifiable? ... Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers. [Non-text portions of this...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
