Group Here are my brief excerpts of recent science news articles. My comments are in square brackets. Some of these articles may not have a links and some of...
2887
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Apr 1, 2002 12:23 pm
Group On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 00:20:36 +1100, Derek McLarnen wrote: [...] SJ>Like Ceasar's Gaul, I have had to divided this response to one of Derek's ... [...] ...
2888
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Apr 1, 2002 12:38 pm
Group On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 07:37:14 +1000, Mark Gosling wrote: [...] MG>My purpose is to examine ... [...] Thanks to Mark for this. Here to confirm Mark's point...
... other ... and ... "microevolution" ... creationist ... are ... not ... As usual Mark provides a well researched and seemingly compelling case. He has...
In a message dated 4/1/2002 4:12:40 AM Pacific Standard Time, ... Ken Ham may have been referring to the hypothetical notion of using the Bible as a scientific...
In a message dated 4/1/2002 4:12:40 AM Pacific Standard Time, ... I believe it is estimated that during the 20th century, the global temp climbed by roughly...
I find this discussion interesting, but I would probably find it more so if I knew where the participants drew the line between micro and macro evolution. To...
... involvement/non-involvement of intelligence or God in the primate diversification process was not even raised. No theistic or atheistic propaganda at all! ...
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 07:37:14 +1000, Mark Gosling wrote: Group, I have read the repeated assertion made on this group and on numerous other groups and sites on...
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:29:29 -0800, Cliff Lundberg wrote: For me the question was always 'How much evolution can take place within a single generation?' DM: ...
... being indoctrinated into Darwinism, so that creationists' attempts to counter-indoctrinate the children into theism appears fair and reasonable. ... ...
... gaining segments, that is, adding the odd segment here and there over evolution. There is so much evidence for the contrary process, loss of segments, that...
2898
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Apr 2, 2002 3:00 pm
Group On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 18:09:26 EST, SirRobPeel@... wrote: Welcome to "SirRobPeel". Perhaps he can tell us more about himself? ... ...
2899
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Apr 2, 2002 3:04 pm
Group ... I have been criticised for my no-nonsense style of moderation on CED. But it is quite clear from the experience of other lists run by...
2900
Phil Skell
tvk@...
Apr 2, 2002 5:02 pm
... Derek, No insult on my part. When faced with a massively obvious fact about which an opponent says I see nothing, the best plan is to ignore the ...
2901
Phil Skell
tvk@...
Apr 2, 2002 5:13 pm
... Thank you. This is what I had in mind, Fiat Naturalism. Obviously this professor has had some gentlemanly breeding, unlike Dawkins, with his famous...
[This is an article I have recently added to my website. It is meant to lead into a hypothesis about how life formed in an orderly manner by design. I am not...
I have received a request from a member for my website url. It is http://newphysicstheory.com. It also can be found by searching fizzeeks or james putnam or...
In a message dated 4/2/2002 7:06:13 AM Pacific Standard Time, ... Sure thing, Steve. SirRobPeel ("SirRob" and "Rob," too) has been my on-line handle for many...
2905
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Apr 3, 2002 5:31 am
Group A member wrote to me privately a couple of weeks ago, about problems he was having with a website that had taken over as his Internet Explorer web ...
... I took it as understood, that evolutionarily successful mutations would by definition have to have spread through the gene pool in question after they ...
... Throughout the 80's I looked pretty hard for papers like this, describing evolutionary series that contradict the pattern of reduction in skeletal ...
2908
Phil Skell
tvk@...
Apr 3, 2002 8:45 pm
... This seems an excellent description. ... Is it not clear that Darwin's terms were dropped in favor of micro- and macro-evolution as a ploy for smuggling in...
2909
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Apr 4, 2002 1:09 am
Group On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 19:27:34 EST, SirRobPeel@... wrote: [...] SRP>As I mentioned earlier, Kyoto was/is ridiculous. It forgets about developing ... ...
Interesting post, Steve, especially the Australia info. I respond to a few points: In a message dated 4/3/2002 5:11:54 PM Pacific Standard Time, ... ...
... From: Stephen E. Jones To: CreationEvolutionDesign@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:00 AM Subject: Re: global warming debate similar to...
2912
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Apr 4, 2002 11:21 pm
Group On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 23:31:48 +1000, Tom Curtis wrote: [...] ... [...] ... TC>Australia DID sign the protocol, OK. Thanks to Tom. I have not studied the...
Whereas Stephen Jones seems happy for creationism of any sort to be taught in science classes, I would be unhappy for creationism of any sort to be taught in...
... From: Stephen E. Jones To: CreationEvolutionDesign@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:23 AM Subject: Re: global warming debate similar to...
2915
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Apr 5, 2002 12:17 pm
Group On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 13:53:10 +1000, Tom Curtis wrote: Thanks to Tom for his information on the Kyoto Protocol. [...] ... TC>Ah! I should follow your...
