Don, Brian, Steve and group, At the risk of being accused of flogging a dead horse I present below further data which confirms the fact that most scientists...
1319
Mark Gosling
markg@...
Oct 1, 2001 12:39 pm
Don, I note that you observe that ID and creationism are peculiarly American obsessions (and - strangely - you sometimes include Australia, a profoundly...
1320
Mark Gosling
markg@...
Oct 1, 2001 3:04 pm
Cliff, You are a master of the laconic aphorism, a role you seem to have taken over from an earlier poster to this site, now departed, Bill Wald. Maybe you are...
1321
Cliff Lundberg
cliff@...
Oct 1, 2001 6:03 pm
... No. Evidently he was too laconic for me to remember. It's easy to seem laconic in contrast to our most prominent poster. There should be room for both...
1322
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Oct 1, 2001 9:11 pm
Group On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:58:00 +1200, Donald Nield wrote: [...] DN>I had planned to sit back for a few weeks and wait for Steve to catch up with ... I must...
1323
Donald Nield
d.nield@...
Oct 1, 2001 9:49 pm
Dear Mark and Group: ... I have thought some more about this topic, and I have asked myself a number of questions, and provided my own answers. 1. What is the...
1324
averylinden@...
Oct 1, 2001 10:12 pm
... below ... disabuse people ... within ... I would have to agree that within scientific methodology and experimentation, religion is out of place. However,...
1325
averylinden@...
Oct 1, 2001 10:18 pm
... American ... religion). Is ... some flaw ... the USA is ... where ... percentage of ... principles ... retains ... Europe ... England, ... numbers of ... ...
1326
averylinden@...
Oct 1, 2001 10:24 pm
... taken over ... you are ... perhaps they ... are, for ... coining ... Huxley ... cause ... believed we ... agnostic is ... inconclusive, ... anyone?) ... ...
1327
Donald Nield
d.nield@...
Oct 1, 2001 10:47 pm
Dear Steve and Group: I apologize to Steve for giving the impression that I was putting any pressure on him to respond to my posts. That was certainly not my...
1328
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Oct 1, 2001 11:56 pm
Group Here is the Introduction page to my online book: "Progressive Creation: Towards a Scientific Theory of Creation". Comments and criticisms welcome. Please...
1329
averylinden@...
Oct 2, 2001 12:02 am
... conclude ... with ... respect to ... particular ... referred to ... judge ... information you ... original ... that is ... Nilsson and ... certainly ... ...
1330
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Oct 2, 2001 12:17 am
Group On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:31:10 -0000, Derik wrote: [...] I have answered Don's responses in a separate post, but I will leave them there to provide context...
1331
Donald Nield
d.nield@...
Oct 2, 2001 12:18 am
Dear mark and Group: ... Regarding YEC it is well known that ICR and AiG are essentially USA organizations (with a few Aussies chucked in). I admit that the...
1332
Stephen E. Jones
senojes@...
Oct 2, 2001 1:33 am
Group From: averylinden@... Date: Tue Oct 2, 2001 6:24 am Subject: Re: Athiest response to the 9-11 tragedy [...] ... TC>Perhaps it shouldn't be so...
1333
Mark Gosling
markg@...
Oct 2, 2001 2:43 am
Hi Don, Thanks for your list of British Christian scientists. You wrote: "I admit that Mark has compiled a list that is impressive (even if he has padded it...
1334
Mark Gosling
markg@...
Oct 2, 2001 3:21 am
Steve and Group, (Hi to TC again). I have noticed a bit of a problem with posting and responding to messages on an open forum, in that a response that would...
1335
Donald Nield
d.nield@...
Oct 2, 2001 4:14 am
Dear Steve and Group: ... Just to clarify a couple of matters: 1. Steve does not appear to appreciate, even though I said so explictly, that Josh Gilder ...
1336
Mark Gosling
markg@...
Oct 2, 2001 5:40 am
Thomas Covenant, Usually your posts are quite lucid, TC, but this time you've lost me. TC wrote: "According to most christians, I will be going to Hell...
1337
Mark Gosling
markg@...
Oct 2, 2001 6:49 am
Don, TC and Steve, I certainly do not want to rush to judgment about this or any other matter. I accept that there probably a quite reasonable answer to the...
1338
Brian D Harper
bharper@...
Oct 2, 2001 7:52 pm
At 04:07 PM 10/2/01 +1000, Mark wrote: [...] ... I've been aware of this little "controversy" for more than 6 years so I thought I might jump in and say a few...
1339
Brian D Harper
bharper@...
Oct 2, 2001 8:59 pm
At 09:50 AM 10/2/01 +1200, Don wrote: [...] ... I have to disagree here a little. A necessary, but not sufficient, condition for Darwinian evolution is the...
1340
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Oct 2, 2001 9:39 pm
Group On Tue, 02 Oct 2001 16:16:09 +1200, Donald Nield wrote: [...] ... [...] ... [...] ... My apologies. I was not aware that Josh Gilder was "connected with ...
1341
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Oct 2, 2001 10:05 pm
Group Apologies to Mark to whom I sent an earlier version of this to him personally by mistake. On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 22:40:45 +1000, Mark Gosling wrote: [...] ...
1342
Stephen E. Jones
sejones@...
Oct 2, 2001 10:34 pm
Group On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 22:12:37 -0000, averylinden@... wrote: [...] ... [...] Just briefly, Thomas can rest assured that if he has no sin, he won't ...
1343
Mark Gosling
markg@...
Oct 3, 2001 5:17 am
Brian and Group, Brian wrote: "This more or less confirms my previous conviction that the real problem was Dawkins original descriptions of the research and...
1344
Cliff Lundberg
cliff@...
Oct 3, 2001 7:18 am
... I have to question this general statement. (But thanks for the discussion of N&P). Is 'Darwinian evolution', in current parlance, absolute gradualism? (I...
1345
Brian D Harper
bharper@...
Oct 3, 2001 6:05 pm
... This is a good question. I've never considered myself much of a Darwinist :), but I can't see why such a situation would not qualify. The key point for me...
1346
Cliff Lundberg
cliff@...
Oct 3, 2001 8:28 pm
Brian D Harper wrote: ... If the size of the steps is not key, the topic is not gradualism vs alternatives. ... What about the model before it is so modified?...
1347
averylinden@...
Oct 3, 2001 11:09 pm
... messages on ... particular ... Jones has ... just ... discovered. ... comments, other ... pass may ... misunderstood by ... the ... rather than ... ...
