Well, it was more than I recalled! Jojo was actually
ON moderation for not documenting or retracting the
claim that Catholics MUST venerate icons. I made it
quite SIMPLE for moderation to be removed, and he
chose to quit (as Jojo) rather than answer, and then
participate under a LIE. If Jojo returns, and he may
for he is not banned, then he must answer to the
moderation before he is allowed to post again. If he
is caught lying to us again about his identity, then
he will be banned. Below is a post reinforcing the
moderation which was put in place AND the conditions
for removal of moderation:

> "Scott" <smwindsor@...> wrote:
>
> Jojo,
> You are under moderation for rules 2 and 4 here:
> 2) Be able to document yourself or retract.
> 4) Abide by the decisions of the moderators.
>
> You don't get to make the rules here. The document
> you presented does NOT say what YOU said.
>
> As I said in private to you - if you will retract your
> initial claim that Catholics MUST have and use icons,
> I will remove the moderation. You can have the
> perceptions and beliefs you choose to hang on to,
> but you cannot falsely represent Catholic teaching
> here.
>
> Like I said the last time you tried to use that documentation,
> Catholics CAN have sacred images - and Canon Law
> says it is VALID - but it doesn't say Catholics MUST
> have sacred images. There's a difference here.
>
> Scott<<<
> Moderator
>
>
>
> --- In BattleACTS@yahoogroups.com, "Scott Windsor, Sr." <smwindsor@> wrote:
> >
> > Jojo,
> > You've tried to use that before and it does
> > not say what YOU are saying! It does not
> > say Catholics MUST have or use sacred images.
> > Yes, it says they CAN be used - but that is
> > NOT your argument! You can't change your
> > argument because you found something SIMILAR.
> >
> > IF you are retracting your initial claim that
> > Catholics MUST have/use icons (sacred images)
> > then just say so - I will remove the moderation.
> >
> > THEN you can assert that Catholics CAN have
> > sacred images - to which I will agree. I have
> > no argument there.
> >
> > Scott<<<
> > Moderator
> >
> > PS- Posting HTML like that doesn't work too
> > well online. In the future, copy/paste the
> > pertinent text and just cite your source.
> > Copying the HTML code is messy - and as you
> > can see below - when "responding" to that in
> > text only, as I usually do, it jumbles the
> > whole thing up making it even more difficult
> > to read - and some here us text-only readers.
> >
> >
> >
> > > --- On Mon, 19/1/09, Scott <smwindsor@>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Scott <smwindsor@>
> > > Subject: [BattleACTS] Re: testing
> > > To: BattleACTS@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Monday, 19 January, 2009, 10:45 AM
> > >
> > > You're still a member here, Jojo, but you're on
> > > moderation until you document that Catholics
> > > MUST use icons (documentation from a valid and
> > > verifiable Catholic source) OR retract your
> > > claim. Once you do, moderation will be removed;
> > > likewise, until you do, moderation will remain
> > > and postings which do not answer the moderation
> > > will either be held until you do or they will be
> > > automatically rejected after 14 days (yahoogroups
> > > does that, not me).
> > >
> > > Scott<<<
> > > Co-Moderator
> >
>