Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
BATN · San Francisco Bay Area Transportation News (BATN)
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
SJ BART extension gets "not recommended" rating   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #15885 of 43179 |
Published Thursday, January 15, 2004, in the San Jose Mercury News

BART to San Jose gets 'Not Recommended' rating
FTA announcemnet due next month

By Gary Richards
Mercury News

The Federal Transit Administration is expected to give the BART to
San Jose project a not recommended rating, a decision which could
affect hundreds of millions of dollars in federal aid needed to
complete the 16-mile extension.

Silicon Valley leaders announced today that the FTA rating would be
most likely released next month.

"This is a disappointing recommendation," said Congressman Mike Honda
from San Jose. "But it wasn't surprising given the economy."

FTA officials would not comment on the ranking, but local officials
said the financial crisis engulfing the Valley Transportation
Authority is the reason. The VTA has been hammered by the recession,
and faces an annual shortfall of $100 million a year to continue
operating its current fleet of buses and trains.

"This has nothing to do with the project itself," said VTA General
Manager Pete Cipolla. "They recognize the project has merit.

"But they are looking at the economic situation and the obvious
financial impacts on VTA. That's why we're getting a not recommended
rating."

The BART extension is expected to cost $4 billion, and four years ago
Santa Clara County voters approved a 30-year, half-cent sales tax
hike to bring the popular commuter trains to downtown San Jose.

The tax, which will be first collected in 2006, was to pay for
slightly more than half of the work. The rest was to come from the
state and Washington.

But Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's budget released last week pulled the
plug on nearly $76 million in state aid that had been promised. And
last year the FTA requested the VTA scale back plans so it could
lower the $834 million in federal aid sought by local leaders.

The FTA decision does not preclude a rating change in future years.
The FTA ranks projects every year, sometimes twice a year.

And some projects which fall on the not-recommended list still are
appropriated funds by Congress, which is now in the middle or
reauthorizing a new transportation budget.


[BATN: See also:

SVMG CEO: budget "won't delay [SJ] BART by one day"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BATN/message/15826

Budget to delay Prop. 42-funded projects, BART
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BATN/message/15787

VTA CFO Buhrer, SJ BART project manager Ives resign
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BATN/message/15749

Letter: Drop SJ BART & fund good transit projects
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BATN/message/15748 ]






Thu Jan 15, 2004 7:58 pm

batn_control
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #15885 of 43179 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Published Thursday, January 15, 2004, in the San Jose Mercury News BART to San Jose gets 'Not Recommended' rating FTA announcemnet due next month By Gary...
1/15 SJ Mercury
batn_control
Offline Send Email
Jan 16, 2004
12:36 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help