ARRL-LOTW : Messages : 11965-11994 of 19504

#11966 From: nand kishore <vu2nks@...>
Date: Mon May 2, 2011 11:11 am
Subject: 9N7AN vu2nks
Send Email

Hi All,
        9N7AN now on LoTW.

              73 de Nandu
                       VU2NKS

#11967 From: "w8jmf" <w8jmf@...>
Date: Mon May 2, 2011 1:14 pm
Subject: Re: expired certificates w8jmf
Send Email

Upgrade to tQSL 1.13 from ARRL site, problem fixed in that release.

73, John

--- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, Chris M0PSK <chrism0psk@...> wrote:
>
> I am new to this group, so please bear with me if my problem has been dealt
> with before. I have two certificates, one for my previous call M3ERE (valid
> till 2012-03-03) and one for my present call M0PSK (valid till 2012-03-04).
> Till now I have only used LoTW on my shack desktop, where it works
> perfectly. I want to be able to use it on my laptop, for portable
> use. Following instructions on the internet I did the following
>
> 1. In tQSL Certificates: right click on the M0PSK certificate
> 2. Click "Save" in the resulting dialogue box
> 3. Enter the password (twice) for the PKCS#12 file
> 4. Enter password to unlock the private key
>
> The result is an error message saying the M0PSK certificate has expired.
> Exactly the same thing happens when I repeat the exercise for the M3ERE
> certificate. I would appreciate any advice on this apparent contradiction.
>
> 73 Chris, M�PSK
>

#11968 From: "chrism0psk" <chrism0psk@...>
Date: Mon May 2, 2011 2:40 pm
Subject: Re: expired certificates chrism0psk
Send Email

Many thanks for very fast replies from Rick K1MU, Jeff NJ2F and John W8JMF, all
of whom pointed out that my problem would disappear (as indeed it did) on
upgrading the TrustedQSL software to the latest version 1.13.

73 Chris, M�PSK

#11969 From: iain macdonnell - N6ML <ar@...>
Date: Mon May 2, 2011 4:13 pm
Subject: Re: 9N7AN ar_n6ml
Send Email

No 9N7AN confirmations for me yet ... I did the PayPal QSL request on
April 8th. Oh well.... patience! I did get a confirmation for VU2NKS
on 17m RTTY recently, though :)

73,

     ~iain / N6ML

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:11 AM, nand kishore <vu2nks@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi All,
> ������� 9N7AN now on LoTW.
>
> ������������� 73 de Nandu
> ���������������������� VU2NKS
>

#11970 From: "Paul Spiteri" <9h1sp@...>
Date: Mon May 2, 2011 4:17 pm
Subject: Re: 9N7AN paul9h1sp
Send Email

Nothing here from 9N7AN
73
9H1SP
Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: "iain macdonnell - N6ML" <ar@...>
To: <ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [ARRL-LOTW] 9N7AN

No 9N7AN confirmations for me yet ... I did the PayPal QSL request on
April 8th. Oh well.... patience! I did get a confirmation for VU2NKS
on 17m RTTY recently, though :)

73,

     ~iain / N6ML

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:11 AM, nand kishore <vu2nks@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi All,
> 9N7AN now on LoTW.
>
> 73 de Nandu
> VU2NKS
>

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

#11971 From: nand kishore <vu2nks@...>
Date: Mon May 2, 2011 5:22 pm
Subject: Re: 9N7AN vu2nks
Send Email

I did a paypal donation too.All my q's in LoTW 80m-10m,3 modes.

73,

Nandu

VU2NKS

--- On Mon, 2/5/11, Paul Spiteri <9h1sp@...> wrote:

From: Paul Spiteri <9h1sp@...>
Subject: Re: [ARRL-LOTW] 9N7AN
To: ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, 2 May, 2011, 9:47 PM

Nothing here from 9N7AN
73
9H1SP
Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: "iain macdonnell - N6ML" <ar@...>
To: <ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [ARRL-LOTW] 9N7AN

No 9N7AN confirmations for me yet ... I did the PayPal QSL request on
April 8th. Oh well.... patience! I did get a confirmation for VU2NKS
on 17m RTTY recently, though :)

73,

~iain / N6ML

#11972 From: "nz9z" <jmeyer@...>
Date: Mon May 2, 2011 6:08 pm
Subject: Identifying mode credit for a band nz9z
Send Email

Hi!   I was wondering if there is any way (short of downloading an ADIF file
from my LOTW account and going through it QSO by QSO)to identify whether my 80M
DXCC credit is from CW or SSB?  The matrix unfortunately doesn't go into that
much detail(wish it could!)

Thanks & 73, John  NZ9Z

#11973 From: "w8jmf" <w8jmf@...>
Date: Mon May 2, 2011 9:28 pm
Subject: Re: Identifying mode credit for a band w8jmf
Send Email

John,

Click on the 80M award line under account status.  Activate the all credits
button and click on the Select button.  Then you can click on the QSO in
question and get the details.

73, John

--- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@...> wrote:
>
> Hi!   I was wondering if there is any way (short of downloading an ADIF file
from my LOTW account and going through it QSO by QSO)to identify whether my 80M
DXCC credit is from CW or SSB?  The matrix unfortunately doesn't go into that
much detail(wish it could!)
>
> Thanks & 73, John  NZ9Z
>

#11974 From: "nz9z" <jmeyer@...>
Date: Tue May 3, 2011 12:55 pm
Subject: Re: Identifying mode credit for a band nz9z
Send Email

Wow!  That's great!  Thanks, John -- I didn't know that function was there!

73, John NZ9Z


--- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "w8jmf" <w8jmf@...> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> Click on the 80M award line under account status.  Activate the all credits
button and click on the Select button.  Then you can click on the QSO in
question and get the details.
>
> 73, John
>
> --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!   I was wondering if there is any way (short of downloading an ADIF file
from my LOTW account and going through it QSO by QSO)to identify whether my 80M
DXCC credit is from CW or SSB?  The matrix unfortunately doesn't go into that
much detail(wish it could!)
> >
> > Thanks & 73, John  NZ9Z
> >
>

#11975 From: "nz9z" <jmeyer@...>
Date: Tue May 3, 2011 1:02 pm
Subject: Re: Identifying mode credit for a band nz9z
Send Email

John -- That's only for LOTW, correct?  Is there any way to determine band/mode
credits for my whole DXCC tally, paper & LOTW?  Probably not....

73, John

--- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@...> wrote:
>
> Wow!  That's great!  Thanks, John -- I didn't know that function was there!
>
> 73, John NZ9Z
>
>
> --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "w8jmf" <w8jmf@> wrote:
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Click on the 80M award line under account status.  Activate the all credits
button and click on the Select button.  Then you can click on the QSO in
question and get the details.
> >
> > 73, John
> >
> > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!   I was wondering if there is any way (short of downloading an ADIF
file from my LOTW account and going through it QSO by QSO)to identify whether my
80M DXCC credit is from CW or SSB?  The matrix unfortunately doesn't go into
that much detail(wish it could!)
> > >
> > > Thanks & 73, John  NZ9Z
> > >
> >
>

#11976 From: "Wes" <wes_quinn@...>
Date: Tue May 3, 2011 1:15 pm
Subject: Re: Identifying mode credit for a band wes_quinn
Send Email

Hi John,

When you are under the Awards tab on LOTW, it does show your entire tally, for
both LOTW and paper cards.  Just select the "All credits" radio button on the
"Account Credits" screen.

And there is a way to tell the difference too.  When on the QSL details, a LOTW
credit it says "QSO Detail" (which is a typo on their part, since it is actually
a QSL :-) ) and for a paper card it says "QSL Card Detail".

73 de k4Wes

--- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@...> wrote:
>
> John -- That's only for LOTW, correct?  Is there any way to determine
band/mode credits for my whole DXCC tally, paper & LOTW?  Probably not....
>
> 73, John
>
> --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> >
> > Wow!  That's great!  Thanks, John -- I didn't know that function was there!
> >
> > 73, John NZ9Z
> >
> >
> > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "w8jmf" <w8jmf@> wrote:
> > >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > Click on the 80M award line under account status.  Activate the all
credits button and click on the Select button.  Then you can click on the QSO in
question and get the details.
> > >
> > > 73, John
> > >
> > > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi!   I was wondering if there is any way (short of downloading an ADIF
file from my LOTW account and going through it QSO by QSO)to identify whether my
80M DXCC credit is from CW or SSB?  The matrix unfortunately doesn't go into
that much detail(wish it could!)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks & 73, John  NZ9Z
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

#11977 From: "nz9z" <jmeyer@...>
Date: Tue May 3, 2011 2:33 pm
Subject: Re: Identifying mode credit for a band nz9z
Send Email

Yes, Wes -- I was just noticing that most were not the typical LOTW style of QSL
details.  I see that another way you can spot the LOTW QSL's on the Accounts
Credit page is that the LOTW callsigns are regular typeface.  The QSL paper card
credits are in bold.

Thanks and 73, John

--- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "Wes" <wes_quinn@...> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> When you are under the Awards tab on LOTW, it does show your entire tally, for
both LOTW and paper cards.  Just select the "All credits" radio button on the
"Account Credits" screen.
>
> And there is a way to tell the difference too.  When on the QSL details, a
LOTW credit it says "QSO Detail" (which is a typo on their part, since it is
actually a QSL :-) ) and for a paper card it says "QSL Card Detail".
>
> 73 de k4Wes
>
> --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> >
> > John -- That's only for LOTW, correct?  Is there any way to determine
band/mode credits for my whole DXCC tally, paper & LOTW?  Probably not....
> >
> > 73, John
> >
> > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Wow!  That's great!  Thanks, John -- I didn't know that function was
there!
> > >
> > > 73, John NZ9Z
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "w8jmf" <w8jmf@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > John,
> > > >
> > > > Click on the 80M award line under account status.  Activate the all
credits button and click on the Select button.  Then you can click on the QSO in
question and get the details.
> > > >
> > > > 73, John
> > > >
> > > > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi!   I was wondering if there is any way (short of downloading an
ADIF file from my LOTW account and going through it QSO by QSO)to identify
whether my 80M DXCC credit is from CW or SSB?  The matrix unfortunately doesn't
go into that much detail(wish it could!)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks & 73, John  NZ9Z
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

#11978 From: "Wes" <wes_quinn@...>
Date: Tue May 3, 2011 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: Identifying mode credit for a band wes_quinn
Send Email

That's true, but if the call is regular typeface that also means it wasn't
applied to an award yet.  Once applied to an award, the call becomes bold
typeface.

73 de k4Wes

--- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@...> wrote:
>
> Yes, Wes -- I was just noticing that most were not the typical LOTW style of
QSL details.  I see that another way you can spot the LOTW QSL's on the Accounts
Credit page is that the LOTW callsigns are regular typeface.  The QSL paper card
credits are in bold.
>
> Thanks and 73, John
>
> --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "Wes" <wes_quinn@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> > When you are under the Awards tab on LOTW, it does show your entire tally,
for both LOTW and paper cards.  Just select the "All credits" radio button on
the "Account Credits" screen.
> >
> > And there is a way to tell the difference too.  When on the QSL details, a
LOTW credit it says "QSO Detail" (which is a typo on their part, since it is
actually a QSL :-) ) and for a paper card it says "QSL Card Detail".
> >
> > 73 de k4Wes
> >
> > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> > >
> > > John -- That's only for LOTW, correct?  Is there any way to determine
band/mode credits for my whole DXCC tally, paper & LOTW?  Probably not....
> > >
> > > 73, John
> > >
> > > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Wow!  That's great!  Thanks, John -- I didn't know that function was
there!
> > > >
> > > > 73, John NZ9Z
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "w8jmf" <w8jmf@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > John,
> > > > >
> > > > > Click on the 80M award line under account status.  Activate the all
credits button and click on the Select button.  Then you can click on the QSO in
question and get the details.
> > > > >
> > > > > 73, John
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi!   I was wondering if there is any way (short of downloading an
ADIF file from my LOTW account and going through it QSO by QSO)to identify
whether my 80M DXCC credit is from CW or SSB?  The matrix unfortunately doesn't
go into that much detail(wish it could!)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks & 73, John  NZ9Z
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

#11979 From: "w8jmf" <w8jmf@...>
Date: Tue May 3, 2011 3:55 pm
Subject: Re: Identifying mode credit for a band w8jmf
Send Email

No, works for cards also.  Detail record will tell you whether it was a card or
LotW.  Unless it's a really, really old credit maybe...  Before computerization?
Not sure about that...

--- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@...> wrote:
>
> John -- That's only for LOTW, correct?  Is there any way to determine
band/mode credits for my whole DXCC tally, paper & LOTW?  Probably not....
>
> 73, John
>
> --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> >
> > Wow!  That's great!  Thanks, John -- I didn't know that function was there!
> >
> > 73, John NZ9Z
> >
> >
> > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "w8jmf" <w8jmf@> wrote:
> > >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > Click on the 80M award line under account status.  Activate the all
credits button and click on the Select button.  Then you can click on the QSO in
question and get the details.
> > >
> > > 73, John
> > >
> > > --- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, "nz9z" <jmeyer@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi!   I was wondering if there is any way (short of downloading an ADIF
file from my LOTW account and going through it QSO by QSO)to identify whether my
80M DXCC credit is from CW or SSB?  The matrix unfortunately doesn't go into
that much detail(wish it could!)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks & 73, John  NZ9Z
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

#11980 From: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@...>
Date: Tue May 3, 2011 7:26 pm
Subject: Re: 9N7AN eye_trade
Send Email

9N7AN confirmed today via LotW. All time new one. Rock on!

73 Rich NN3W

----- Original Message -----

From: nand kishore

To: ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 1:22 PM

Subject: Re: [ARRL-LOTW] 9N7AN

I did a paypal donation too.All my q's in LoTW 80m-10m,3 modes.
73,

Nandu

VU2NKS

--- On Mon, 2/5/11, Paul Spiteri <9h1sp@...> wrote:

From: Paul Spiteri <9h1sp@...>
Subject: Re: [ARRL-LOTW] 9N7AN
To: ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, 2 May, 2011, 9:47 PM

Nothing here from 9N7AN
73
9H1SP
Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: "iain macdonnell - N6ML" <ar@...>
To: <ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [ARRL-LOTW] 9N7AN

No 9N7AN confirmations for me yet ... I did the PayPal QSL request on
April 8th. Oh well.... patience! I did get a confirmation for VU2NKS
on 17m RTTY recently, though :)

73,

~iain / N6ML

#11981 From: "kevm0tnx" <m0tnx@...>
Date: Wed May 4, 2011 8:43 am
Subject: Problems with entries.. kevm0tnx
Send Email

Hello All..

Please can I first introduce myself, and say thanks to the group admin and mods.

I'm Kev Haworth, M0TNX/MR0TNX/2E0XTC, spend a lot of time portable near the
beach and using vertical antennas. I signed up for LoTW in December 2010, I
should have done it years ago!

I am actively chasing my mixed DXCC, and then after that, I will concentrate on
160 DXCC, around 8 years ago I had a hard drive crash, which lost my details of
some 160 plus countries worked, I have backd up ever since!

Please could you advise me on the following, does LoTW automatically convert
times submitted to UTC, or is it best to log in UTC as a matter of course? I'm
new to HRD and have only just found the setting  to set the clock to UTC, hence,
some logs are out of schedule with other users..

I'm on 86 confirmed now, and pushing hard for the 100, so please, if you hear me
on the bands, do come and say Hi!

Thanks in advance.

Kev

M0TNX

#11982 From: Tom GM4FDM <tom@...>
Date: Wed May 4, 2011 9:26 am
Subject: Re: Problems with entries.. tomwylie15
Send Email

Hi Kev I dont think LOTW converts anything to anything, it is basically a storgare place for logs and has the capacity to compare logs and find a match - hence you get a confirmed QSO. For Amateur Radio purposes it is much better to keep you log to UTC or GMT whichever you prefer to call it. LOTW in comparing logs to agree QSOs has a time window or around 20 minutes I believe, by which I mean that if your log differs from the log of the DX station by more than 20 minutes - then LOTW will fail to find a match. So it is important that your PC is on the correct time and I suggest always UTC/GMT. There are programmes out there you can download to run in the back ground which will lock your PC to GMT/UTC - like "Atomic Clock". I always have one running in the background of my radio PC. Hope this helps - good luck - feel free to email direct off group. 73 de Tom GM4FDM
On 04/05/2011 09:43, kevm0tnx wrote:

Hello All..
Please can I first introduce myself, and say thanks to the group admin and mods.
I'm Kev Haworth, M0TNX/MR0TNX/2E0XTC, spend a lot of time portable near the beach and using vertical antennas. I signed up for LoTW in December 2010, I should have done it years ago!
I am actively chasing my mixed DXCC, and then after that, I will concentrate on 160 DXCC, around 8 years ago I had a hard drive crash, which lost my details of some 160 plus countries worked, I have backd up ever since!
Please could you advise me on the following, does LoTW automatically convert times submitted to UTC, or is it best to log in UTC as a matter of course? I'm new to HRD and have only just found the setting to set the clock to UTC, hence, some logs are out of schedule with other users..
I'm on 86 confirmed now, and pushing hard for the 100, so please, if you hear me on the bands, do come and say Hi!
Thanks in advance.
Kev
M0TNX
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
ARRL-LOTW-digest@yahoogroups.com ARRL-LOTW-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ARRL-LOTW-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
______________________________________________ This email has been scanned by Netintelligence http://www.netintelligence.com/email

http://www.qsl.net/ve6lb/

#11983 From: "Elsie & Gerry" <telwest@...>
Date: Wed May 4, 2011 1:10 pm
Subject: Re: Problems with entries.. telwest2000
Send Email

Kev,

LoTW records must be in UTC (see TQSL HELP). If not, you will not get matched QSOs. Fix your times and re-upload. no need to delete the ones with bad times. There is no delete process on LoTW. The bad Qs will just never be matched.

73,
Gerry VE6LB/VA6XDX
DXCC Field Checker-Southern Alberta
VE/VA6 QSL Bureau Team
(403) 803-8170

ve6lb@...

From: Tom GM4FDM

Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 3:26 AM

To: ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com

Cc: kevm0tnx

Subject: Re: [ARRL-LOTW] Problems with entries..

#11984 From: "Wes" <wes_quinn@...>
Date: Wed May 4, 2011 6:25 pm
Subject: Re: Problems with entries.. wes_quinn
Send Email

Hi Kev and welcome to LoTW.  :-)

Sorry to hear about your data loss, but I'm glad to hear that you are back in
the game again.

Times are in UTC and must be within 30 minutes of the other contact to match:

https://p1k.arrl.org/lotw/faq#datamatch

73 es GL de k4Wes

--- In ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com, Tom GM4FDM <tom@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Kev
>
> I dont think LOTW converts anything to anything, it is basically a
> storgare place for logs and has the capacity to compare logs and find a
> match - hence you get a confirmed QSO.   For Amateur Radio purposes it
> is much better to keep you log to UTC or GMT whichever you prefer to
> call it.
>
> LOTW in comparing logs to agree QSOs has a time window or around 20
> minutes I believe, by which I mean that if your log differs from the log
> of the DX station by more than 20 minutes - then LOTW will fail to find
> a match.
>
> So it is important that your PC is on the correct time and I suggest
> always UTC/GMT.   There are programmes out there you can download to run
> in the back ground which will lock your PC to GMT/UTC - like "Atomic
> Clock".   I always have one running in the background of my radio PC.
>
> Hope this helps - good luck - feel free to email direct off group.
>
> 73 de Tom
> GM4FDM
>
> On 04/05/2011 09:43, kevm0tnx wrote:
> > Hello All..
> >
> > Please can I first introduce myself, and say thanks to the group admin and
mods.
> >
> > I'm Kev Haworth, M0TNX/MR0TNX/2E0XTC, spend a lot of time portable near the
beach and using vertical antennas. I signed up for LoTW in December 2010, I
should have done it years ago!
> >
> > I am actively chasing my mixed DXCC, and then after that, I will concentrate
on 160 DXCC, around 8 years ago I had a hard drive crash, which lost my details
of some 160 plus countries worked, I have backd up ever since!
> >
> > Please could you advise me on the following, does LoTW automatically convert
times submitted to UTC, or is it best to log in UTC as a matter of course? I'm
new to HRD and have only just found the setting  to set the clock to UTC, hence,
some logs are out of schedule with other users..
> >
> > I'm on 86 confirmed now, and pushing hard for the 100, so please, if you
hear me on the bands, do come and say Hi!
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Kev
> >
> > M0TNX
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
> > http://www.netintelligence.com/email
> >
> >
>

#11985 From: "Paul Spiteri" <9h1sp@...>
Date: Wed May 4, 2011 6:37 pm
Subject: help paul9h1sp
Send Email

Hi all,

Please care to click this link http://www.witbjbf.com/?id=BieberObsessed11 , only a click is enough ( just open the page )

It is only a link to help my daughter in Justin Bieber Fan Club.

Thanks

Paul

Reply | Messages in this Topic (1)

#11986 From: Chris M0PSK <chrism0psk@...>
Date: Wed May 4, 2011 7:32 pm
Subject: station locations chrism0psk
Send Email

A couple of days back the group solved a specific problem with the TrustedQSL software on my shack desktop. (The solution was to upgrade to the �latest version 1.13, which I did.) I'm afraid I have to ask for help again.�

The objective was to enable me to use LoTW from a laptop, running Vista SP2. I �installed the same version of TrustedQSL on the laptop, without problems. I �then saved the certificates for my two calls M3ERE and M0PSK on the desktop, �transferred them to the laptop, and loaded the two files into TQSLCert. Still no �problems. It remained to add the station locations in TQSL. I started with my �present call M0PSK, and produced a station location called M0PSK (Home), still �without problems.�

The next step was to deal with M3ERE. In detail: I clicked "Station|Add �Location", chose the call sign M3ERE, entered the same station information I �had entered for M0PSK, and clicked "Next". In the main pane I saw Home (M0PSK), �the location I had already constructed. Under "Station Location Name" I typed �Home, as before, and clicked Finish. Now comes the problem. When I click �"Station|Edit Locations" I only see M3ERE-Home. By contrast, when I do this on �the desktop I see both M3ERE-Home and M0PSK-Home. Any advice will be welcome.

73 Chris, M�PSK

Reply | Messages in this Topic (3)

#11987 From: iain macdonnell - N6ML <ar@...>
Date: Wed May 4, 2011 7:40 pm
Subject: Re: station locations ar_n6ml
Send Email

Hi Chris,

I'm not sure why it would be different between the laptop and desktop, but I suggest you do not use the same name ("Home") for the two locations, even though they should be distinguished by the callsign, it appears that the name is used as a key. Suggest you name one of them something like "M3ERE@Home" and the other "M0PSK@Home"), so you'll end up with "M3ERE - M3ERE@Home", etc., in the display.

73,

�� ~iain / N6ML

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Chris M0PSK <chrism0psk@...> wrote:

�

A couple of days back the group solved a specific problem with the TrustedQSL software on my shack desktop. (The solution was to upgrade to the �latest version 1.13, which I did.) I'm afraid I have to ask for help again.�

The objective was to enable me to use LoTW from a laptop, running Vista SP2. I �installed the same version of TrustedQSL on the laptop, without problems. I �then saved the certificates for my two calls M3ERE and M0PSK on the desktop, �transferred them to the laptop, and loaded the two files into TQSLCert. Still no �problems. It remained to add the station locations in TQSL. I started with my �present call M0PSK, and produced a station location called M0PSK (Home), still �without problems.�

The next step was to deal with M3ERE. In detail: I clicked "Station|Add �Location", chose the call sign M3ERE, entered the same station information I �had entered for M0PSK, and clicked "Next". In the main pane I saw Home (M0PSK), �the location I had already constructed. Under "Station Location Name" I typed �Home, as before, and clicked Finish. Now comes the problem. When I click �"Station|Edit Locations" I only see M3ERE-Home. By contrast, when I do this on �the desktop I see both M3ERE-Home and M0PSK-Home. Any advice will be welcome.

73 Chris, M�PSK

Reply | Messages in this Topic (3)

#11988 From: Crownhaven <crownhaven@...>
Date: Wed May 4, 2011 10:23 pm
Subject: 4A4A gatorman_71
Send Email

I noticed that two Q's from 4A4A on 12 and 17 meters ( as shown next to
date/time did not link up with my log.  Interestingly, in the frequency
column, I see 21.00100 on both Q's.  Any ideas??????  Does my log see
the 12 and 17 meters or is it looking for the frequency.

Steve, N4JQQ

Reply | Messages in this Topic (5)

#11989 From: Ricardo Navarrete <ricardoea4zk@...>
Date: Wed May 4, 2011 10:25 pm
Subject: Re: 4A4A ea4zk
Send Email

Wait ... I had the same problem, but now it is fixed

�

2011/5/5 Crownhaven <crownhaven@...>

�

I noticed that two Q's from 4A4A on 12 and 17 meters ( as shown next to
date/time did not link up with my log. Interestingly, in the frequency
column, I see 21.00100 on both Q's. Any ideas?????? Does my log see
the 12 and 17 meters or is it looking for the frequency.

Steve, N4JQQ

EA4ZK Ricardo Navarrete
ricardoea4zk@...
Tnx es cul , 73 gd DX
http://www.ea4zk.es/weather/index.htm

�

Reply | Messages in this Topic (5)

#11990 From: Peter Laws <plaws0@...>
Date: Wed May 4, 2011 10:40 pm
Subject: Re: 4A4A plawsy_y
Send Email

Just saw the note from ARRL saying that the operation had been
approved and, BOOM, I have all the credits!�  That was fun chasing
them around.

That XF4 was #100 for me on RTTY makes it even better!


--
Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!

Reply | Messages in this Topic (5)

#11991 From: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@...>
Date: Thu May 5, 2011 1:07 am
Subject: 9N7AN Not Showing In DXCC Application Form markgc3
Send Email

My three 9N7AN QSO's are showing in LOTW as a match but when I look at the DXCC Application my 17m cw qso is not showing in the list even though the table shows that I have never worked Nepal on 17m. Why is this matched QSO not appearing in the application list. Is this a software glitch?

If I do a 9N7AN search it is showing my 3 qso's but the 17m contact is not listed as Nepal. LOTW doesn't seem to know that 9N7AN is Nepal for that contact. Maybe the 9N7AN log wasn't filled in correctly before it was uploaded. Who should I contact at Head Office?

3 Records Shown (1-3)
Sorted by Call sign (2.562021 seconds elapsed)
Showing DXCC Award data for
N1UK - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

#11992 From: iain macdonnell - N6ML <ar@...>
Date: Thu May 5, 2011 1:17 am
Subject: Re: 9N7AN Not Showing In DXCC Application Form ar_n6ml
Send Email

How did you determine that your three QSOs were matched? It appears that, in fact, your 17m QSO did NOT match for a QSL...

�� ~iain / N6ML

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Mark Robinson <markrob@...> wrote:

�

My three 9N7AN QSO's are showing in LOTW as a match but when I look at the DXCC Application my 17m cw qso is not showing in the list even though� the table shows that I have never worked Nepal on 17m. Why is this matched QSO not appearing in the application list. Is this a software glitch?

�

If I do a 9N7AN search it is showing my 3 qso's but the 17m contact is not listed as Nepal. LOTW doesn't seem to know that 9N7AN is Nepal for that contact. Maybe the 9N7AN log wasn't�filled in correctly before it was uploaded.� �Who should I contact at Head Office?

�

�

3 Records Shown (1-3)
Sorted by Call sign (2.562021 seconds elapsed)
Showing DXCC Award data for
N1UK - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

� Call sign Worked Date/Time Band Mode Freq QSL DXCC

Details N1UK 9N7AN 2011-04-02 14:25:00 17M CW 18.074 � �

Details N1UK 9N7AN 2011-03-31 21:13:00 20M SSB 14.205 NEPAL �

Details N1UK 9N7AN 2011-03-31 15:12:00 15M CW 21.029 NEPAL 15M; Challenge; CW

#11993 From: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@...>
Date: Thu May 5, 2011 1:23 am
Subject: Re: 9N7AN Not Showing In DXCC Application Form markgc3
Send Email

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

----- Original Message -----

From: iain macdonnell - N6ML

To: ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, 04 May, 2011 9:17 PM

Subject: Re: [ARRL-LOTW] 9N7AN Not Showing In DXCC Application Form

How did you determine that your three QSOs were matched? It appears that, in fact, your 17m QSO did NOT match for a QSL...

~iain / N6ML

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Mark Robinson <markrob@...> wrote:

My three 9N7AN QSO's are showing in LOTW as a match but when I look at the DXCC Application my 17m cw qso is not showing in the list even though the table shows that I have never worked Nepal on 17m. Why is this matched QSO not appearing in the application list. Is this a software glitch?

If I do a 9N7AN search it is showing my 3 qso's but the 17m contact is not listed as Nepal. LOTW doesn't seem to know that 9N7AN is Nepal for that contact. Maybe the 9N7AN log wasn't filled in correctly before it was uploaded. Who should I contact at Head Office?

3 Records Shown (1-3)
Sorted by Call sign (2.562021 seconds elapsed)
Showing DXCC Award data for
N1UK - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

If I click on the QSO details I get this...it looks like a match to me. What do you think?
Station
Call Sign		N1UK
DXCC		UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CQ Zone		5
ITU Zone		8
Grid		FM05tt
State		NC
County		WAKE
Worked Station
Worked		9N7AN
Date/Time		2011-04-02 14:25:00
Mode		CW (CW)
Band		17M
Frequency		18.074

Record ID 343182685 Received: 2011-05-05 00:37:12

Call sign

Worked

Date/Time

Band

Mode

Freq

QSL

DXCC

Details

N1UK

9N7AN

2011-04-02 14:25:00

17M

18.074

Details

N1UK

9N7AN

2011-03-31 21:13:00

20M

SSB

14.205

NEPAL

Details

N1UK

9N7AN

2011-03-31 15:12:00

15M

21.029

NEPAL

15M; Challenge; CW

#11994 From: iain macdonnell - N6ML <ar@...>
Date: Thu May 5, 2011 1:29 am
Subject: Re: 9N7AN Not Showing In DXCC Application Form ar_n6ml
Send Email

No, if it matched, there would be a QSL date/time below "Frequency".
You should see that in the detail for the other two QSOs. What you're
looking at is merely the QSO data that you loaded. You are in the
9N7AN online log for 17m CW, so double-check the date/time of your
QSO, and if you're sure about it, try contacting DL4SVA....

73,

��� ~iain



On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Mark Robinson <markrob@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> If I click on the QSO details I get this...it looks like a match to me. What
do you think?
>
>
> Station
> Call Sign�N1UK
> DXCC�UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
> CQ Zone�5
> ITU Zone�8
> Grid�FM05tt
> State�NC
> County�WAKE
> Worked Station
> Worked�9N7AN
> Date/Time�2011-04-02 14:25:00
> Mode�CW (CW)
> Band�17M
> Frequency�18.074
> ________________________________
> Record ID 343182685 Received: 2011-05-05 00:37:12
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: iain macdonnell - N6ML
> To: ARRL-LOTW@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, 04 May, 2011 9:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARRL-LOTW] 9N7AN Not Showing In DXCC Application Form
>
> How did you determine that your three QSOs were matched? It appears that, in
fact, your 17m QSO did NOT match for a QSL...
>
> ��� ~iain / N6ML
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Mark Robinson <markrob@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> My three 9N7AN QSO's are showing in LOTW as a match but when I look at the
DXCC Application my 17m cw qso is not showing in the list even though� the table
shows that I have never worked Nepal on 17m. Why is this matched QSO not
appearing in the application list. Is this a software glitch?
>>
>> If I do a 9N7AN search it is showing my 3 qso's but the 17m contact is not
listed as Nepal. LOTW doesn't seem to know that 9N7AN is Nepal for that contact.
Maybe the 9N7AN log wasn't�filled in correctly before it was uploaded.� �Who
should I contact at Head Office?
>>
>>
>> 3 Records Shown (1-3)
>> Sorted by Call sign (2.562021 seconds elapsed)
>> Showing DXCC Award data for
>> N1UK - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
>>
>> � Call sign Worked Date/Time Band Mode Freq QSL DXCC
>> Details N1UK 9N7AN 2011-04-02 14:25:00 17M CW 18.074
>> Details N1UK 9N7AN 2011-03-31 21:13:00 20M SSB 14.205 NEPAL
>> Details N1UK 9N7AN 2011-03-31 15:12:00 15M CW 21.029 NEPAL 15M; Challenge; CW
>
>